MyFreud

Published

VR and standard exposure CBT both eased teen social anxiety

A pilot randomized trial in 51 adolescents found both virtual-reality and imaginal-exposure CBT reduced social anxiety, with gains held at 3 months.

Illustration accompanying coverage of a 2026 social-anxiety study.

A 2026 study published in Depression and anxiety reports new findings relevant to social-anxiety.

What the study reported

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relative effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with imaginal exposure (CBT + IE) and CBT combined with virtual reality exposure (CBT + VRE) for symptoms of social anxiety disorder (SAD) and fear of negative evaluation (FNE) in adolescents. In a three-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT), a total of 51 adolescents who met the DSM-5 criteria for SAD were randomly assigned to either CBT + IE (N = 17; M age = 16.41; SD = 0.61), CBT + VRE (N = 17; M age = 16.35; SD = 0.70), or a waitlist control condition (WLCC; N = 17; M age = 16.00; SD = 0.70). Participants were assessed pre and posttreatment and followed up 3 months after the last treatment session regarding symptoms of social phobia, measured with the social phobia inventory (SPIN), and FNE, measured with the FNE Questionnaire. A linear mixed model (LMM) analysis revealed significant differences between the treatment groups and WLCC in interaction with the three assessment times in SAD and FNE. A significant reduction of both CBT + VRE and CBT + IE treatments on symptoms of SAD from pretreatment to posttreatment and 3 months follow-up (d pre-post = 1.31 and d pre-fu = 1.43 in CBT + VRE group; d pre-post = 1.90 and d pre-fu = 2.04 in CBT + IE group) and FNE (d pre-post = 1.35 and d pre-fu = 1.68 in the CBT + VRE group; d pre-post = 1.95 and d pre-fu = 1.59 in the CBT + IE group) compared to the WLCC was observed. No significant differences were observed between the VRE + CBT and CBT + IE groups on FNE. With respect to SAD, statistically significant between-group differences emerged in favour of the CBT + IE group, accompanied by substantial effect sizes at posttreatment (d = 0.87) and follow-up (d = 0.73). The results support the effectiveness of CBT + IE and CBT + VRE in reducing the symptoms of SAD and FNE, which were maintained 3 months after treatment. Future research should focus on optimizing VRE protocols, exploring long-term outcomes, and investigating its applicability across diverse populations. Further exploration of the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of VR technology in clinical settings is required. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: IRCT20210213050343N2.

The source

These findings are drawn from “Virtual Reality Exposure-Enhanced Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT + VRE) vs. CBT With Imaginal Exposure (CBT + IE) for Adolescent Patients Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder Symptoms: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial” (Azimisefat P, Ravanbod S, de Jongh A, et al., 2026), published in Depression and anxiety. Read the full study on PubMed.

References

  1. 1.Azimisefat P, Ravanbod S, de Jongh A, et al. ( 2026). Virtual Reality Exposure-Enhanced Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT + VRE) vs. CBT With Imaginal Exposure (CBT + IE) for Adolescent Patients Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder Symptoms: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Depression and anxiety. Link . doi:10.1155/da/9956436